Bilderberg 2016, Orwell and the Precariats

Bilderberg

The Bilderberg Meetings that are held annually have been the subject of many alternative media articles over the years and the 2016 meeting in Dresden will be no exception. Bilderbergmeetings.org outlines their agenda and their participants these days in a move that most realise is an attempt to distract and misdirect the growing focus on their activities. 

The key point to the Bilderberg Meetings though is in their own website homepage under “About Bilderberg Meetings”. Although the first few lines mention "informal discussions" the last few lines make the real purpose of the meetings clear:

The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor of any other participant may be revealed. Thanks to the private nature of the meeting, the participants are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights. 

The Bilderberg meetings are now merely sessions where participants are instructed as to what needs to be done. There is no open discussion, rather it is a one way download of instructions that the participants need to "receive" and act on. The plans have already been formulated. The design is complete. The meetings are there to simply ensure that the right messages are received by the right people so that the true ultimate goal, which most participants would be unaware of, is eventually reached.

The Precariats

Definition: People living a precarious existence, without security or predictability, especially job security.

Formed through the combination of the two words Precarious and Proletariats 

Of particular note in this year's Bilderberg, is the inclusion of Guy Standing as a participant.

Guy Standing published The Precariat - The New Dangerous Class in 2011, a book that explores the new emerging class of people facing insecurity, moving in and out of precarious work that gives little meaning to their lives. Unemployed and underemployed, the precariats are a growing class of increasingly desperate individuals trying to make ends meet in a time where wealth inequality is at its peak and job opportunities are dwindling. The continued loss of paid employment to unquestioning robots is accelerating the growth of the precariat class and Standing warns that this is producing instabilities in society. He cites the victimisation of migrants and other vulnerable minority groups as a typical response by precariats and suggests that many of this class are susceptible to the dangers of political extremism and social unrest. 

Standing argues for a new politics which puts the fears and aspirations of the precariat at the heart of a progressive strategy of redistribution and income security.

Expect a twist on this theme that will be adopted (and accepted by the precariats) in his new work following Bilderberg.

The Orwell Prophecy

Many say that George Orwell's 1984 is upon us now and it is hard not to agree. The propaganda, the surveillance, the control of media, the lack of free speech, false flags and the never ending war with far off fictitious enemies are all elements of Orwell's dystopian world that reflect our own 21st century existence.

Orwell was a visionary that was able to extrapolate his experiences as a middle to lower class youth, a Burmese policeman, a soldier and his time spent in the poor parts of England, into a picture of the world in the future. A world controlled by the few with strong class systems, everlasting war and little hope for the population.

As Orwell wrote in 1984:

"There are only four ways in which a ruling group can fall from power.  Either it is conquered from without, or it governs so inefficiently that the masses are stirred to revolt, or it allows a strong and discontented Middle group to come into being, or it loses its own self-confidence and willingness to govern.  These causes do not operate singly, and as a rule all four of them are present in some degree.  A ruling class which could guard against all of them would remain in power permanently."

The "ruling group" that controls the world from the shadows in the 21st century, understands these principles and have been planning to "guard against" their fall from power for many decades. Let’s review each of the four ways.

"it is conquered from without"

The clandestine forces of the CIA, NSA, ASIO, MI6, etc, have been manipulating any possible threat from "without" for many years. Through overt measures such as conflict, cold wars and propaganda and covert means such as the use of agent provocateurs, sabotage, bribery, blackmail, etc, it is unlikely that the "ruling group will be conquered from any external force.

"it governs so inefficiently that the masses are stirred to revolt" 

Much has been done by the "ruling group" to quell any uprising even though we are governed inefficiently. Propaganda is the main tool used to both distract and dissuade us from any revolution. Groups (such as Anonymous) and most alternative media sites (such as Infowars) have been infiltrated, bought or controlled and increased surveillance ensures any possible new threat is eliminated before any revolt can manifest. 

Revolts that do start to materialise are soon dealt with through the growing arsenal at the government's disposal. We have seen the growing militarisation of those government agencies tasked with civil obedience (such as the police, National Guard, Homeland Security, etc) and the introduction of new weaponry for the quelling of riots and unrest. Some examples are:

·      Active Denial System - designed to heat the skin of the target and inflict a high level of pain;

·      Armoured Water Cannons - designed to shoot a high velocity stream of water at targets;

·      The Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) - a sonic weapon that can be used to inflict harmful, pain inducing tones over long distances;

·      Riot Gun - a gun used to fire "non lethal" ammunition such as pepper spray, tear gas, chemical agents, smoke grenades, etc;

·      The Personal Halting and Stimulation Response rifle (PHaSR) - a laser shooter designed to temporarily blind the target;

·      Taser Shotguns - delivers a debilitating electric shock from up to a distance of 100 feet away.

There has been an unprecedented increase in the weapons and forces designed to stop a civil uprising because the uprising is a very real possibility.

It would seem that there is but one conclusion that we are rushing headlong towards. But if we, the apparently awakened and enlightened ones, can see it then surely the shadow controllers can also see it and make better preparations than mere crowd control forces and weaponry?

We are also continually reminded of our differences such as colour of skin, country of origin, differences in religion, etc to ensure we continue to fight amongst ourselves instead of organising a collective revolt. The enemy, we are told, is anyone except the government and "ruling group". 

"it allows a strong and discontented Middle group to come into being"

Actions are ongoing to ensure an organised "Middle group" does not manifest. The previous Middle Class have all but disappeared and are being replaced by the precariats. Actions against the precariats are currently being put into place and the 2016 Bilderberg meeting will instruct participants of the actions required to dispel this threat. 

What will the actions be? Most likely free money, perceived involvement and security will be offered to the precariats in exchange for their acceptance and allegiance to the "ruling group". Switzerland have just completed a vote on a guaranteed income to all, regardless of employment status. The final vote was against the proposal but the "ruling group" will learn from this experiment and the next phase will certainly be more successful.  It is no coincidence that Guy Standing, who promotes this concept as a defence against the rise of the precariats, is attending Bilderberg this month.

(Events on this issue are likely to unfold sooner rather than later and actions could well be in place before 2016 ends.)

"it loses its own self-confidence and willingness to govern"

As the "ruling group" is comprised of faceless and nameless individuals operating in the shadows, this scenario is almost certainly not likely. Any individual in the group could be swiftly and quietly eliminated at the first sign of dissent. 

Hope?

The parallels of our current situation and George Orwell's 1984 are undeniable. Even to the point of Hope.

The novel's main character, Winston, summed up the hope of the people:

"If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there, in those swarming disregarded masses, eighty-five percent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated."

"....if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength, would have no need to conspire.  They needed only to rise up and shake themselves like a horse shaking off flies.  If they chose they could blow the Party to pieces tomorrow morning.  Surely sooner or later it must occur to them to do it?  And yet -----!" 

"He wrote:

Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious."

                       Hope may lie in the precariats but perhaps not for long.....